Advertisement
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Newton's laws of heart transplant allocation

  • Amrut V. Ambardekar
    Correspondence
    Reprint requests: Amrut V. Ambardekar, MD, Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Consortium for Fibrosis Research & Translation, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12700 E. 19th Avenue, Campus Box B-139, Aurora, CO 80045. Telephone: 303-724-6400. Fax: 303-724-2094..
    Affiliations
    Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
    Search for articles by this author
  • Jordan R.H. Hoffman
    Affiliations
    Department of Surgery, Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, Colorado
    Search for articles by this author
Published:November 08, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.11.001
      In 1687, Isaac Newton described 3 laws to explain the motion of objects and systems of motion in his Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica (Mathematical Principals of Natural Philosophy). Over 300 years later, not only are these laws of motion the foundation of classical physics, but they can likewise apply to donor heart allocation. In 1984, the National Organ Transplant Act was passed to ensure the fair and equitable allocation of organs, leading to the establishment of the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN). In 1986, OPTN contracted with the private nonprofit organization United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) to formalize an allocation system to prioritize patients based on disease severity and time on a national waitlist, and in 1988, the first 2-tiered heart allocation system was implemented. With the advent of durable left ventricular assist devices (LVADs), a 3-tiered system was implemented in 1998 (status 1A (highest priority), status 1B (intermediate priority), and status 2 (low priority)) again aimed to reduce waitlist time and mortality for the sickest patients. Finally, in 2005, broader geographic sharing rules were implemented to further reduce the waitlist time among the most critically ill, but the original 3-tiers remained unchanged.
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Shore S
        • Golbus JR
        • Aaronson KD
        • Nallamothu BK.
        Changes in the United States adult heart allocation policy: challenges and opportunities.
        Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2020; 13e005795
        • Parker WF
        • Anderson AS
        • Hedeker D
        • et al.
        Geographic variation in the treatment of U.S. adult heart transplant candidates.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018; 71: 1715-1725
        • Cogswell R
        • John R
        • Estep JD
        • et al.
        An early investigation of outcomes with the new 2018 donor heart allocation system in the United States.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2020; 39: 1-4
        • Kilic A
        • Hickey G
        • Mathier MA
        • et al.
        Outcomes of the first 1300 adult heart transplants in the United States after the allocation policy change.
        Circulation. 2020; 141: 1662-1664
        • Kilic A
        • Mathier MA
        • Hickey GW
        • et al.
        Evolving trends in adult heart transplant with the 2018 heart allocation policy change.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2021; 6: 159-167
        • Mullan CW
        • Chouairi F
        • Sen S
        • et al.
        Changes in use of left ventricular assist devices as bridge to transplantation with new heart allocation policy.
        JACC Heart Fail. 2021; 9: 420-429
        • Bradbrook KGR
        • Lindblad K
        • Daly RC
        • Hall S
        A national assessment of one-year heart outcomes after the 2018 adult heart allocation change.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2022;
        • Parker WF
        • Chung K
        • Anderson AS
        • Siegler M
        • Huang ES
        • Churpek MM.
        Practice changes at U.S. transplant centers after the new adult heart allocation policy.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 75: 2906-2916
        • Hoffman JRH
        • McMaster WG
        • Rali AS
        • et al.
        Early US experience with cardiac donation after circulatory death (DCD) using normothermic regional perfusion.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2021; 40: 1408-1418
        • Madan S
        • Saeed O
        • Forest SJ
        • Goldstein DJ
        • Jorde UP
        • Patel SR.
        Feasibility and potential impact of heart transplantation from adult donors after circulatory death.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022; 79: 148-162