Advertisement
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
Original Clinical Science| Volume 42, ISSUE 3, P345-353, March 2023

Download started.

Ok

Heart transplant offers are less likely to be accepted on weekends, holidays, and conferences

Published:November 02, 2022DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2022.10.018

      Background

      The existence of a “weekend effect” in heart transplantation (HTx) is understudied. The present study sought to determine whether the odds of (HTx) offer acceptance differed for adult and pediatric candidates depending upon the day on which the offer occurred.

      Methods

      United Network for Organ Sharing data were used to identify all HTx offers to adult (listing age ≥18) and pediatric candidates from 2000-2019. Odds of offer acceptance were studied, comparing weekends, holidays, and conferences (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS], American Association for Thoracic Surgery [AATS], International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation [ISHLT]) to “baseline” (all other days). Multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to determine independent predictors of offer nonacceptance, controlling for the impacts of program transplant volume, region, and candidate characteristics.

      Results

      A total of 323,953 offers occurred – 298,405 to adults and 25,548 to pediatric candidates. Clinically significant differences did not exist in donor or candidate characteristics between baseline or other events. The number of offers per day was stable throughout the year for both adults (p = 0.191) and pediatrics (p = 0.976). In adults, independently lower odds of acceptance existed on weekends (OR 0.88 [95% CI 0.84-0.92]), conferences in aggregate (0.86 [0.77-0.95]), and holidays in aggregate (0.81 [0.72-0.91]). In children, independently lower odds of acceptance were seen on weekends (0.88 [0.79-0.98]), during STS (0.46 [0.25-0.83], and during Christmas (0.32 [0.14-0.76]).

      Conclusions

      The day on which a HTx offer occurs significantly impacts its likelihood of acceptance. Further work can determine the impacts of human behavior or resource distribution, but knowledge of this phenomenon can inform efforts to ensure ideal organ allocation throughout the year.

      KEYWORDS

      Abbreviations:

      AATS (American Association for Thoracic Surgery), CI (confidence interval), ISHLT (International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation), PTR (Potential Transplant Recipient), UNOS (United Network for Organ Sharing), STS (Society of Thoracic Surgeons.)
      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Bell CM
        • Redelmeier DA.
        Mortality among patients admitted to hospitals on weekends as compared with weekdays.
        N Engl J Med. 2001; 345: 663-668https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmsa003376
        • Cram P
        • Hillis SL
        • Barnett M
        • Rosenthal GE.
        Effects of weekend admission and hospital teaching status on in-hospital mortality.
        Am J Med. 2004; 117: 151-157https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2004.02.035
        • Pauls LA
        • Johnson-Paben R
        • McGready J
        • Murphy JD
        • Pronovost PJ
        • Wu CL.
        The weekend effect in hospitalized patients: a meta-analysis.
        J Hosp Med. 2017; 12: 760-766https://doi.org/10.12788/jhm.2815
        • Scandling JD.
        The weekend effect and workforce in kidney transplantation.
        Transplant Int. 2020; 33: 1013-1015https://doi.org/10.1111/tri.13676
        • Mohan S
        • Foley K
        • Chiles MC
        • et al.
        The weekend effect alters the procurement and discard rates of deceased donor kidneys in the United States.
        Kidney Int. 2016; 90: 157-163https://doi.org/10.1016/j.kint.2016.03.007
        • Elhamahmi DA
        • Chaly T
        • Wei G
        • Hall IE.
        Kidney discard rates in the United States During American transplant congress meetings.
        Transplant Direct. 2018; 5: e412https://doi.org/10.1097/txd.0000000000000849
        • Cohen JB
        • Shults J
        • Goldberg DS
        • Abt PL
        • Sawinski DL
        • Reese PP.
        Kidney allograft offers: predictors of turndown and the impact of late organ acceptance on allograft survival.
        Am J Transplant. 2018; 18: 391-401https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14449
        • Carpenter DJ
        • Chiles MC
        • Verna EC
        • et al.
        Deceased brain dead donor liver transplantation and utilization in the United States.
        Transplantation. 2018; https://doi.org/10.1097/tp.0000000000002533
        • Giafaglione J
        • Morrison A
        • Gowda C
        • Gajarski R
        • Nandi D.
        Pediatric donor heart allocation in the United States, 2006-2017: current patterns and potential for improvement.
        Pediatr Transplant. 2020; 24: e13743https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13743
      1. UNOS: DonorNet 2018 update - frequently asked questions. Accessed December 1, 2021. https://unos.org/news/frequently-asked-questions-about-donornet-organ-offer-system-changes/.

        • Staples A
        • LeBlond R
        • Watkins S
        • Wong C
        • Brandt J.
        Validation of the revised Schwartz estimating equation in a predominantly non-CKD population.
        Pediatr Nephrol. 2010; 25: 2321-2326https://doi.org/10.1007/s00467-010-1598-7
        • Chokshi A
        • Cheema FH
        • Schaefle KJ
        • et al.
        Hepatic dysfunction and survival after orthotopic heart transplantation: application of the MELD scoring system for outcome prediction.
        J Hear Lung Transplant. 2012; 31: 591-600https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healun.2012.02.008
        • Colvin M
        • Smith JM
        • Ahn Y
        • et al.
        OPTN/SRTR 2020 annual data report: heart.
        Am J Transplant. 2022; 22: 350-437https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16977
        • Hsich EM.
        Matching the market for heart transplantation.
        Circulation Hear Fail. 2018; 9e002679https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.115.002679
        • Colvin M
        • Smith JM
        • Ahn Y
        • et al.
        OPTN/SRTR 2019 annual data report: heart.
        Am J Transplant. 2021; 21: 356-440https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.16492
        • Goldstein BA
        • Thomas L
        • Zaroff JG
        • Nguyen J
        • Menza R
        • Khush KK.
        Assessment of heart transplant waitlist time and pre- and post-transplant failure.
        Epidemiology. 2016; 27: 469-476https://doi.org/10.1097/ede.0000000000000472
        • Rana A
        • Fraser CD
        • Scully BB
        • et al.
        Inferior outcomes on the waiting list in low-volume pediatric heart transplant centers.
        Am J Transplant. 2017; 17: 1515-1524https://doi.org/10.1111/ajt.14252
        • Grodin JL
        • Ayers CR
        • Thibodeau JT
        • et al.
        Variation of heart transplant rates in the United States during holidays.
        Clin Transplant. 2014; 28: 877-882https://doi.org/10.1111/ctr.12396
        • Butler A
        • Chapman G
        • Johnson JN
        • et al.
        Behavioral economics—A framework for donor organ decision-making in pediatric heart transplantation.
        Pediatr Transplant. 2020; 24: e13655https://doi.org/10.1111/petr.13655
        • Choi AY
        • Mulvihill MS
        • Lee HJ
        • et al.
        Transplant center variability in organ offer acceptance and mortality among us patients on the heart transplant waitlist.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2020; 5: 660-668https://doi.org/10.1001/jamacardio.2020.0659
        • Chen CW
        • Auvil BJ
        • Zhang JC
        • et al.
        Transplant volume is associated with graft acceptance threshold and center resource availability.
        J Card Fail. 2020; 26: 522-526https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cardfail.2019.03.009