Advertisement
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.
Original Clinical Science| Volume 41, ISSUE 8, P1055-1062, August 2022

Download started.

Ok

Recovery of left ventricular function is associated with improved outcomes in LVAD recipients

      Background

      The significance of recovered left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) in LVAD recipients, outside of pump explantation, is unclear.

      Methods

      Patients undergoing first LVAD implantation at Duke University Hospital between 2006 and 2017 were evaluated for LVEF recovery up to 2 years following implant. Occurrence of gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB), hospitalization for heart failure (HF), pump thrombosis and death were assessed before and after LVEF recovery.

      Results

      Of 286 patients who met inclusion criteria, 9.8% reached a “threshold” of recovery with an LVEF 40%. 17.4% achieved “relative” recovery with an increase in LVEF 10% since LVAD implantation. For either definition, recovered patients had a lower incidence of a composite endpoint of GIB, HF hospitalization, pump thrombosis, or death compared to patients without recovery. Patients with “threshold” recovery had 4.7 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 0.7-33.6) compared to 48.8 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 39.5-60.3) without “threshold” recovery [p = .020]. Those with “relative” recovery had 14.1 events per 100 patient-years [95% CI, 5.9-33.8] versus 50.7 events per 100 patient-years (95% CI, 40.7-63.0) without “relative” recovery [p = 0.005]. However, improved outcomes in the “relative” recovery group were limited to those who also met the “threshold” definition. Importantly, among patients who achieved “threshold” recovery, the incidence of the composite endpoint declines in the postrecovery period, suggesting that LVEF recovery mechanistically results in improved outcomes.

      Conclusions

      An LVEF 40% associates with better outcomes in LVAD recipients. Methods to promote recovery could reduce morbidity and mortality related to LVAD support.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online access
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Mehra MR
        • Uriel N
        • Naka Y
        • et al.
        A fully magnetically levitated left ventricular assist device.
        N Engl J Med. 2019; 380: 1618-1627
        • Kormos RL
        • Cowger J
        • Pagani FD
        • et al.
        The society of thoracic surgeons intermacs database annual report: evolving indications, outcomes, and scientific partnerships.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2019; 38: 114-126
        • Wilcox JE
        • Fang JC
        • Margulies KB
        • Mann DL.
        Heart failure with recovered left ventricular ejection fraction: JACC Scientific Expert Panel.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020; 76: 719-734
        • Van Kirk J
        • Fudim M
        • Green CL
        • Karra R.
        Heterogeneous outcomes of heart failure with better ejection fraction.
        J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2019; : 1-9
        • Basuray A
        • French B
        • Ky B
        • et al.
        Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction: clinical description, biomarkers, and outcomes.
        Circulation. 2014; 129: 2380-2387
        • Kalogeropoulos AP
        • Fonarow GC
        • Georgiopoulou V
        • et al.
        Characteristics and outcomes of adult outpatients with heart failure and improved or recovered ejection fraction.
        JAMA Cardiol. 2016; 1: 510-518
        • Birks EJ
        • Tansley PD
        • Hardy J
        • et al.
        Left ventricular assist device and drug therapy for the reversal of heart failure.
        N Engl J Med. 2006; 355: 1873-1884
        • Birks EJ
        • Drakos SG
        • Patel SR
        • et al.
        Prospective multicenter study of myocardial recovery using left ventricular assist devices (RESTAGE-HF [Remission from Stage D Heart Failure]) medium-term and primary end point results.
        Circulation. 2020; 142: 2016-2028
        • Mancini DM
        • Beniaminovitz A
        • Levin H
        • et al.
        Low incidence of myocardial recovery after left ventricular assist device implantation in patients with chronic heart failure.
        Circulation. 1998; 98: 2383-2389
        • Mentz RJ
        • Buggey J
        • Fiuzat M
        • et al.
        Torsemide versus furosemide in heart failure patients: insights from Duke University Hospital.
        J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 2015; 65: 438
        • Drakos SG
        • Wever-Pinzon O
        • Selzman CH
        • et al.
        Magnitude and time course of changes induced by continuous-flow left ventricular assist device unloading in chronic heart failure: insights into cardiac recovery.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013; 61: 1985-1994
        • Drakos SG
        • Pagani FD
        • Lundberg MS
        • Baldwin JT.
        Advancing the science of myocardial recovery with mechanical circulatory support: a working group of the national, heart, lung, and blood institute.
        JACC. 2017; 2: 335-340
      1. Team RC. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2013.

        • Wever-Pinzon O
        • Selzman CH
        • Drakos SG
        • et al.
        Pulsatility and the risk of nonsurgical bleeding in patients supported with the continuous-flow left ventricular assist device HeartMate II.
        Circulation. 2013; 6: 517-526
        • Edwards AL
        • Fitzmorris P
        • Pamboukian SV
        • George JF
        • Wilcox CM
        • Peter S.
        Association of pulsatility with gastrointestinal bleeding in a cohort of heartmate II recipients.
        Asaio J. 2018; 64: 472-479
        • Moazami N
        • Dembitsky WP
        • Adamson R
        • et al.
        Does Pulsatility Matter in the era of Continuous-Flow Blood Pumps?.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 34: 999-1004
        • Wever-Pinzon O
        • Drakos SG
        • McKellar SH
        • et al.
        Cardiac recovery during long-term left ventricular assist device support.
        J Am CollCardiol. 2016; 68: 1540-1553
        • Moazami N
        • Dembitsky WP
        • Adamson R
        • et al.
        Does pulsatility matter in the era of continuous-flow blood pumps?.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 34: 999-1004
        • Tabit CE
        • Chen P
        • Kim GH
        • et al.
        Elevated angiopoietin-2 level in patients with continuous-flow left ventricular assist devices leads to altered angiogenesis and is associated with higher nonsurgical bleeding.
        Circulation. 2016; 134: 141-152
        • Eleuteri E
        • Di Stefano A
        • Tarro Genta F
        • et al.
        Stepwise increase of angiopoietin-2 serum levels is related to haemodynamic and functional impairment in stable chronic heart failure.
        Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011; 18: 607-614
        • Chong AY
        • Caine GJ
        • Freestone B
        • Blann AD
        • Lip GY
        Plasma angiopoietin-1, angiopoietin-2, and angiopoietin receptor tie-2 levels in congestive heart failure.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004; 43: 423-428
        • Eleuteri E
        • Di Stefano A
        • Giordano A
        • et al.
        Prognostic value of angiopoietin-2 in patients with chronic heart failure.
        Int J Cardiol. 2016; 212: 364-368
        • Pöss J
        • Ukena C
        • Kindermann I
        • et al.
        Angiopoietin-2 and outcome in patients with acute decompensated heart failure.
        Clin Res Cardiol. 2015; 104: 380-387
        • Converse MP
        • Sobhanian M
        • Taber DJ
        • Houston BA
        • Meadows HB
        • Uber WE
        Effect of angiotensin II inhibitors on gastrointestinal bleeding in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
        J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019; 73: 1769-1778
        • Houston BA
        • Schneider AL
        • Vaishnav J
        • et al.
        Angiotensin II antagonism is associated with reduced risk for gastrointestinal bleeding caused by arteriovenous malformations in patients with left ventricular assist devices.
        J Heart Lung Transpl. 2017; 36: 380-385
        • Schultz JN
        • Trachtenberg B
        • Estep J
        • et al.
        Association of use of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or angiotensin II receptor blockers on LVAD support and risk of gastrointestinal bleeding: a multi-center analysis.
        J Heart Lung Transpl. 2020; 39: S28
        • Berube L
        • Drezek K
        • Camuso J
        • et al.
        ACE inhibitor use is associated with reduction in gastrointestinal bleeding events in CF-LVAD patients.
        J Heart Lung Transpl. 2020; 39: S28
        • McCullough M
        • Caraballo C
        • Ravindra NG
        • et al.
        Neurohormonal blockade and clinical outcomes in patients with heart failure supported by left ventricular assist devices.
        Jama Cardiol. 2020; 5: 175-182