KEYWORDS
Purchase one-time access:
Academic & Personal: 24 hour online accessCorporate R&D Professionals: 24 hour online accessOne-time access price info
- For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
- For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'
Subscribe:
Subscribe to The Journal of Heart and Lung TransplantationReferences
- Generic drug immunosuppression in thoracic transplantation: an ISHLT educational advisory.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28: 655-660
- Clinical trials for immunosuppression in transplantation: the case for reform and change in direction.Transplantation. 2017; 101: 1527-1534
- Developing new immunosuppression for the next generation of transplant recipients: the path forward.Am J Transplant. 2016; 16: 1094-1101
- Lemtrada [package insert].Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA2017
- Neoral [package insert].Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ2015
- Sandimmune [package insert].Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ2015
- Prograf [package insert].Astellas Pharma US, Inc, Deerfield, IL2012
- Myfortic [package insert].Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ2016
- CellCept [package insert].Genentech, Inc, South San Francisco, CA2015
- Rapamune [package insert].Pfizer Inc, Philadelphia, PA2018
- Zortress [Package insert].Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ2018
- Induction therapy in heart transplantation: where are we now?.Transpl Int. 2013; 26: 684-695
- Simulect [package insert].Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ2005
- Thymoglobulin [package insert].Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA2017
- Campath [package insert].Genzyme Corporation, Cambridge, MA2014
- Report from a consensus conference on antibody-mediated rejection in heart transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011; 30: 252-269
- Desensitization strategies in adult heart transplantation-will persistence pay off?.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35: 962-972
- Antibody-mediated rejection of the lung: a consensus report of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35: 397-406
- Gengraf (cyclosporine) [package insert].AbbVie Inc, North Chicago, IL2017
- Recommendations for the use of medications with continuous enteral nutrition.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2009; 66: 1458-1467
- [package insert].Veloxis Pharmaceuticals, Inc, Edison, NJ2016
- Long-term stability of a patient-convenient 1 mg/ml suspension of tacrolimus for accurate maintenance of stable therapeutic levels.Bone Marrow Transplant. 2006; 37: 781-784
- Pharmacokinetics in stable heart transplant recipients after conversion from twice-daily to once-daily tacrolimus formulations.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011; 30: 1003-1010
- Comparison of tacrolimus absorption in transplant patients receiving continuous versus interrupted enteral nutrition feeding.Ann Pharmacother. 1998; 32: 633-636
- Sublingual administration of tacrolimus: current trends and available evidence.Pharmacotherapy. 2014; 34: 1209-1219
- Bioavailability of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-Coatedcoated mycophenolate sodium is differentially affected by pantoprazole in healthy volunteers.J Clin Pharmacol. 2009; 49: 1196-1201
- No relevant pharmacokinetic interaction between pantoprazole and mycophenolate in renal transplant patients: a randomized crossover study.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2015; 80: 1086-1096
- Imuran [package insert].Prometheus Laboratories Inc, Hunt Valley, MD2011
- Stability of allopurinol and of five antineoplastics in suspension.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1983; 40: 616-618
- The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report-2017; focus theme: allograft ischemic time.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017; 36: 1047-1059
- Four-hour versus 24-hour intravenous infusion of FK 506 in liver transplantation.Transplant Proc. 1991; 23: 2767-2770
- Stability and sorption of FK 506 in 5% dextrose injection and 0.9% sodium chloride injection in glass, polyvinyl chloride, and polyolefin containers.Am J Hosp Pharm. 1992; 49: 119-122
- Stability of tacrolimus in an extemporaneously compounded oral liquid.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1997; 54: 178-180
- Sublingual tacrolimus as an alternative to oral administration for solid organ transplant recipients.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015; 72: 277-284
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health>NIOSH Alert: preventing occupational exposure to antineoplastic and other hazardous drugs in health care settings. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2004-165/pdfs/2004-165.pdf?id=10.26616/NIOSHPUB2004165.
- [package insert].Astellas Pharma US, Inc, Northbrook, IL2015
- Pharmacokinetic study of conversion from tacrolimus twice-daily to tacrolimus once-daily in stable lung transplantation.Transplantation. 2014; 97: 358-362
- Cyclosporin clinical pharmacokinetics.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1993; 24: 472-495
- A new microemulsion formulation of cyclosporin: pharmacokinetic and clinical features.Clin Pharmacokinet. 1996; 30: 181-193
- Effect of assay methodology on pharmacokinetic differences between cyclosporine Neoral and Sandimmune formulations.Clin Chem. 1997; 43: 104-108
- Sandimmun and Neoral treatment: pharmacokinetics and kidney function in paediatric and adolescent renal transplant.Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 1677
- Comparison of Sandimmune and Neoral pharmacokinetics (PK) in a stable pediatric renal transplant population.Pediatr Transplant. 1998; 2: 12-30
- Pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine in pediatric long-term liver transplant recipients converted from Sandimmune to Neoral.Transpl Int. 1997; 10: 419-425
- Successful reconversion from tacrolimus to cyclosporine A Neoral in pediatric liver recipients.Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 2276-2278
- Study of the circadian variation of cyclosporine pharmacokinetics.Transplant Proc. 1997; 29: 2930-2931
- Cyclosporine pharmacokinetics in renal allograft recipients with diabetes mellitus with Sandimmune and Sandimmune Neoral.Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 3140-3141
- Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of cyclosporine Sandimmune with Sandimmune Neoral in stable renal transplant patients.Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2961-2963
- Comparative pharmacokinetic study of Neoral vs Sandimmun in Japanese stable renal allograft recipients.Transplant Proc. 1999; 31: 3089-3092
- Randomized, trough blood cyclosporine concentration-controlled trial to compare the pharmacodynamics of Sandimmune and Neoral in de novo lung transplant recipients.Ther Drug Monit. 1999; 21: 17-26
- Safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of Sandimmun Neoral: conversion study in stable renal transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 1330-1332
- Cyclosporine pharmacokinetic profiles in stable renal allograft recipients converting from Sandimmune to Neoral.Transplant Proc. 1996; 28: 1324-1326
- Pharmacokinetic of Sandimmune versus Sandimmune Neoral in heart transplant recipients.Clin Invest Med. 1996; 19: S107
- Pharmacokinetic, hemodynamic, and metabolic effects of cyclosporine Sandimmune versus the microemulsion neoral in heart transplant recipients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 1997; 16: 787-794
- Comparison of pharmacokinetics between CsA capsules and Sandimmun Neoral in pediatric patients.Transplant Proc. 1994; 26: 2973-2974
- Bioavailability of Sandimmun® versus Sandimmune Neoral®: a meta-analysis of published studies.Int J Immunopathol Pharmacol. 2010; 23: 1177-1183
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER)>Guidance for industry bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products — general considerations. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/files/drugs/published/Guidance-for-Industry-Bioavailability-and-Bioequivalence-Studies-for-Orally-Administered-Drug-Products—General-Considerations.PDF.
- The new European Medicines Agency guideline on the investigation of bioequivalence.Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2010; 106: 221-225
- The registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: thirty-fourth adult heart transplantation report-2017; focus theme: allograft ischemic time.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2017; 36: 1037-1046
- Enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium delivers bioequivalent MPA exposure compared with mycophenolate mofetil.Clin Transpl. 2005; 19: 199-206
- A prospective analysis of the effects of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil co-medicated with a proton pump inhibitor in kidney transplant recipients at a single institute in China.Transplant Proc. 2014; 46: 1362-1365
- Diminished mycophenolic acid exposure caused by omeprazole may be clinically relevant in the first week post transplantation.Ther Drug Monit. 2012; 34: 331-336
- The role of proton pump inhibitors on early mycophenolic acid exposure in kidney transplantation: evidence from the CLEAR study.Ther Drug Monit. 2011; 33: 120-123
- Proton pump inhibitor co-medication reduces active drug exposure in heart transplant recipients receiving mycophenolate mofetil.Transplant Proc. 2010; 42: 4243-4246
- Proton pump inhibitors interfere with the immunosuppressive potency of mycophenolate mofetil.Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010; 49: 2061-2067
- Proton pump inhibitors reduce mycophenolate exposure in heart transplant recipients-a prospective case-controlled study.Am J Transplant. 2009; 9: 1650-1656
- Proton pump inhibitor co-medication reduces mycophenolate acid drug exposure in heart transplant recipients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28: 605-611
- Omeprazole impairs the absorption of mycophenolate mofetil but not of enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in healthy volunteers.J Clin Pharmacol. 2012; 52: 1265-1272
- The proton pump inhibitor pantoprazole and its interaction with enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium in transplant recipients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2011; 30: 565-571
- Proton pump inhibitors do not increase the risk of acute rejection.Neth J Med. 2014; 72: 86-90
- Concomitant proton pump inhibitors with mycophenolate mofetil and the risk of rejection in kidney transplant recipients.Transplantation. 2014; 97: 518-524
- Renal transplant acute rejection with lower mycophenolate mofetil dosing and proton pump inhibitors or Histamine-2 receptor antagonists.Pharmacotherapy. 2017; 37: 1507-1515
- Pediapred [package insert].Sanofi-Aventis Canada Inc, Laval, Quebec2017
- Stability of acetazolamide, allopurinol, azathioprine, clonazepam, and flucytosine in extemporaneously compounded oral liquids.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 1996; 53: 1944-1949
- The absorption site of cyclosporin in the human gastrointestinal tract.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 33: 39-43
- P-glycoprotein and drug therapy in organ transplantation.J Clin Pharmacol. 1999; 39: 995-1005
- Analysis, pharmacokinetics and therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid.Clin Biochem. 1998; 31: 323-328
- Pharmacokinetics of intravenous and oral prednisolone.Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1980; 10: 503-508
- Assessment of tacrolimus absorption from the human intestinal tract: open-label, randomized, 4-way crossover study.Clin Ther. 2014; 36: 748-759
- Sequential group trial to determine gastrointestinal site of absorption and systemic exposure of azathioprine.Dig Dis Sci. 2000; 45: 1601-1607
Regulatory Focus>Brennan Z. Patents vs. Market Exclusivity: why does it take so long to being generics to the market? Available at:https://www.raps.org/regulatory-focus%E2%84%A2/news-articles/2016/8/patents-vs-market-exclusivity-why-does-it-take-so-long-to-bring-generics-to-market
- Narrow therapeutic index drugs: an approach to bioequivalence and interchangeability.in: Paper presented at: Meeting of the FDA Advisory Committee for Pharmaceutical Science and Clinical Pharmacology, Silver Spring, MDJuly 26, 2011
- Neoplanta as a new microemulsion formula of cyclosporine in renal transplantation: comparative study with neoral for efficacy and safety.Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 3547-3548
- A one-year comparative study of Neoral vs Consupren in de novo renal transplant patients.Transplant Proc. 1998; 30: 3533-3534
- Conversion of stable renal allograft recipients to a bioequivalent cyclosporine formulation.Transplantation. 2002; 74: 1013-1017
- Neoral-to-Gengraf conversion in renal transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2003; 35: 1308-1313
- Does bioequivalence between modified cyclosporine formulations translate into equal outcomes?.Transplantation. 2005; 80: 1633-1635
- The clinical impact of 1:1 conversion from Neoral to a generic cyclosporine (Gengraf) in renal transplant recipients with stable graft function.Clin Transpl. 2006; 20: 313-317
- Comparison of generic cyclosporine microemulsion versus Neoral in de novo renal transplant recipients managed by 2-hour postdose monitoring.Transplant Proc. 2006; 38: 2051-2053
- Pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of Iminoral compared with Neoral in healthy volunteers and renal transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2007; 39: 1214-1218
- Do we have the same clinical results with Neoral and Equoral treatment in kidney transplant recipients? A pilot study.Transpl Int. 2008; 21: 392-394
- Interchangeability of ciclosporin formulations in stable adult renal transplant recipients: comparison of Equoral and Neoral capsules in an international, multicenter, randomized, open-label trial.Kidney Int Suppl. 2010; (S12-6)
- Safety and efficacy of generic cyclosporine arpimune in Filipino low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2012; 44: 101-108
- One-year multicenter double-blind randomized clinical trial on the efficacy and safety of generic cyclosporine (Iminoral) in de novo kidney transplant recipients.Exp Clin Transplant. 2015; 13: 233-238
- The impact of conversion from Prograf to generic tacrolimus in liver and kidney transplant recipients with stable graft function.Am J Transplant. 2011; 11: 1861-1867
- A multicenter experience with generic tacrolimus conversion.Transplantation. 2011; 92: 653-657
- Therapeutic equivalence and pharmacokinetics of generic tacrolimus formulation in de novo kidney transplant patients.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2013; 28: 3110-3119
- Clinical outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in hospitalized kidney transplant recipients.Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2013; 70: 1507-1512
- Clinical outcomes after conversion from brand-name tacrolimus (Prograf) to a generic formulation in renal transplant recipients: a retrospective cohort study.P T. 2013; 38: 484-488
- A retrospective assessment of safety, efficacy, and pharmacoenconomics of generic azathioprine in heart-transplant recipients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001; 20: 372-374
- Immunosuppressive regimens containing generic mycophenolate mofetil (Myfenax) in de novo renal transplant recipients–preliminary results of 6-month observation.Ann Transplant. 2011; 16: 74-80
- Pilot study on the efficacy and safety of generic mycophenolate mofetil (Mycept) compared with CellCept among incident low-risk primary kidney transplant recipients.Transplant Proc. 2014; 46: 415-417
- Evaluation of clinical and safety outcomes associated with conversion from brand-name to generic tacrolimus in transplant recipients enrolled in an integrated health care system.Pharmacotherapy. 2012; 32: 981-987
- Safety and efficacy of the switch to generic mycophenolate mofetil and tacrolimus in heart transplant patients.Clin Transpl. 2015; 29: 619-628
- Short-term outcomes in heart transplant recipients treated with generic tacrolimus.Open J Organ Transplant Surg. 2013; 3: 19-21
- Multi-center evaluation of analytical performance of the microparticle enzyme immunoassay for sirolimus.Clin Biochem. 2006; 39: 378-386
- CEDIA sirolimus assay compared with HPLC-MS/MS and HPLC-UV in transplant recipient specimens.Ther Drug Monit. 2005; 27: 309-314
- Positive bias in mycophenolic acid concentrations determined by the CEDIA assay compared to HPLC-UV method: is CEDIA assay suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of mycophenolic acid?.J Clin Lab Anal. 2013; 27: 77-80
- Validation of an assay for routine monitoring of sirolimus using HPLC with mass spectrometric detection.Clin Chem. 2000; 46: 1179-1183
- al. Cyclosporin whole blood immunoassays (AxSYM, CEDIA, and EMIT): a critical overview of performance characteristics and comparison with HPLC.Clin Chem. 1998; 44: 2158-2164
- Comparison of the CEDIA and MEIA assays for the measurement of sirolimus in organ transplant recipients.Clin Biochem. 2007; 40: 680-687
- al. Multi-site analytical evaluation of the Abbott ARCHITECT tacrolimus assay.Ther Drug Monit. 2009; 31: 198-204
- Multi-site analytical evaluation of a chemiluminescent magnetic microparticle immunoassay (CMIA) for sirolimus on the Abbott ARCHITECT analyzer.Clin Biochem. 2009; 42: 1543-1548
- Crossreactivity of isolated everolimus metabolites with the Innofluor Certican immunoassay for therapeutic drug monitoring of everolimus.Ther Drug Monit. 2007; 29: 743-749
- Limitations of immunoassays used for therapeutic drug monitoring of immunosuppressants.in: Oellerich M Dasgupta A Personalized immunosuppression in transplantation. Elselvier, The Netherlands2015: 29-51
- Experiences from using LC-MS/MS for analysis of immunosuppressive drugs in a TDM service.Clin Biochem. 2016; 49: 1024-1031
- Long-term evaluation of analytical methods used in sirolimus therapeutic drug monitoring.Clin Transpl. 2014; 28: 243-251
- Comparison between ultra-performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry and a chemiluminescence immunoassay in the determination of cyclosporin A and tacrolimus levels in whole blood.Exp Ther Med. 2013; 6: 1535-1539
- High-performance liquid chromatography versus immunoassay for the measurement of sirolimus: comparison of two methods.Transplant Proc. 2006; 38: 78-80
- Comparison of everolimus QMS immunoassay on Architect ci4100 and liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry: lack of agreement in organ-transplanted patients.Ther Drug Monit. 2015; 37: 214-219
- Comparison of high-performance liquid chromatography and enzyme-multiplied immunoassay technique to monitor mycophenolic acid in paediatric renal recipients.Pediatr Nephrol. 2008; 23: 1859-1865
- Therapeutic monitoring of mycophenolate mofetil.Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2007; 2: 184-191
- Pharmacokinetics of mycophenolic acid and its phenolic-glucuronide and acyl glucuronide metabolites in stable thoracic transplant recipients.Ther Drug Monit. 2008; 30: 282-291
- Cyclosporine C2 levels have impact on incidence of rejection in de novo lung but not heart transplant recipients: the NOCTURNE study.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28: 919-926
- A randomized, controlled trial of C0- vs C2-guided therapeutic drug monitoring of cyclosporine in stable heart transplant patients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24: 2137-2143
- The International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the care of heart transplant recipients.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2010; 29: 914-956
- C2 (2-h) levels are not superior to trough levels as estimates of the area under the curve in tacrolimus-treated renal-transplant patients.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2002; 17: 1487-1490
- Clinical pharmacokinetics of tacrolimus in heart transplantation: new strategies of monitoring.Transplant Proc. 2003; 35: 1988-1991
- Tacrolimus pharmacokinetics in lung transplantation: new strategies for monitoring.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24: 1315-1319
- Pharmacokinetic study of tacrolimus in cystic fibrosis and non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients and design of Bayesian estimators using limited sampling strategies.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2005; 44: 1317-1328
- Does the evidence support the use of mycophenolate mofetil therapeutic drug monitoring in clinical practice? A systematic review.Transplantation. 2008; 85: 1675-1685
- Pharmacokinetic monitoring of mycophenolic acid in heart transplant patients: correlation the side-effects and rejections with pharmacokinetic parameters.Ann Transplant. 2012; 17: 68-78
- The impact of routine mycophenolate mofetil drug monitoring on the treatment of cardiac allograft rejection.Transplantation. 2000; 69: 2326-2330
- Best single time points to predict the area-under-the-curve in long-term heart transplant patients taking mycophenolate mofetil in combination with cyclosporine or tacrolimus.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24: 1614-1618
- Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil in heart transplantation: a randomized, multicenter trial.Am J Transplant. 2013; 13: 1203-1216
- Tacrolimus with mycophenolate mofetil or sirolimus compared with calcineurin inhibitor-free immunosuppression (sirolimus/mycophenolate mofetil) after heart transplantation: 5 year results.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013; 32: 277-284
- Everolimus initiation with early calcineurin inhibitor withdrawal in de novo heart transplant recipients: three-year results from the randomized SCHEDULE study.Am J Transplant. 2016; 16: 1238-1247
- Everolimus versus mycophenolate mofetil de novo after lung transplantation: a prospective, randomized, open-label trial.Am J Transplant. 2016; 16: 3171-3180
- Use of sirolimus and low-dose calcineurin inhibitor in lung transplant recipients with renal impairment: results of a controlled pilot study.Kidney Int. 2005; 67: 1471-1475
- Pharmacokinetic optimization of immunosuppressive therapy in thoracic transplantation: part I.Clin Pharmacokinet. 2009; 48: 419-462
- Impact of rabbit antithymocyte globulin dose on long-term outcomes in heart transplant patients.Transplantation. 2016; 100: 685-693
- Immunosuppression in lung transplantation.J Thorac Dis. 2014; 6: 1039-1053
- Thymoglobulin induction in heart transplantation: patient selection and implications for maintenance immunosuppression.Transpl Int. 2015; 28: 259-269
- A proposal for early dosing regimens in heart transplant patients receiving thymoglobulin and calcineurin inhibition.Transplant Direct. 2016; 2: e81
- CD3 monitoring of antithymocyte globulin therapy in thoracic organ transplantation.Transplantation. 2002; 73: 1339-1341
- Induction therapy with thymoglobulin after heart transplantation: impact of therapy duration on lymphocyte depletion and recovery, rejection, and cytomegalovirus infection rates.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008; 27: 1115-1121
- Medication nonadherence after lung transplantation in adult recipients.Ann Thorac Surg. 2017; 103: 274-280
- A review of the management of pregnancy after cardiac transplantation.Clin Transpl. 2015; 31: 151-161
- Pregnancy after heart and lung transplantation.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28: 1146-1162
- Immunosuppressive drugs and fetal outcome.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28: 1174-1187
- Immunosuppressant therapy in pregnant organ transplant recipients.Semin Perinatol. 2007; 31: 363-371
- Breast-feeding after transplantation.Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2014; 28: 1163-1173
- Prednisone [package insert].Roxane Laboratories, Inc, Columbus, OH2012
- Solu-Medrol [package insert].Pfizer, New York, NY2011
- Schaefer C Drugs during pregnancy and lactation treatment options and risk assessment. Academic Press, Elsevier, London2015
- BSR and BHPR guideline on prescribing drugs in pregnancy and breastfeeding-part I: standard and biologic disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and corticosteroids.Rheumatology (oxford). 2016; 55: 1693-1697
Health Products Regulatory Authority>CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil)—Important Safety Information from Roche Products (Ireland) Ltd. Available at:https://www.hpra.ie/homepage/medicines/safety-notices/item?t=/cellcept-(mycophenolate-mofetil)—important-safety-information-from-roche-products-(ireland)-ltd&id=f9fe0326-9782-6eee-9b55-ff00008c97d0.
- The 2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation listing criteria for heart transplantation: a 10-year update.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35: 1-23
- A consensus document for the selection of lung transplant candidates: 2014–an update from the Pulmonary Transplantation Council of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2015; 34: 1-15
- Cardiac transplantation for older patients: characteristics and outcomes in the septuagenarian population.J Heart Lung Transplant. 2016; 35: 362-369
- Lung transplantation in elderly patients.J Thorac Dis. 2017; 9: 3346-3351
- A rationale for age-adapted immunosuppression in organ transplantation.Transplantation. 2015; 99: 2258-2268
- Age-related pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic changes and related risk of adverse drug reactions.Curr Med Chem. 2010; 17: 571-584
- Heart transplantation in the elderly: why cardiac transplantation does not need to be limited to younger patients but can be safely performed in patients above 65 years of age.Ann Transplant. 2010; 15: 110-119