Advertisement
The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation.

Extended criteria donor lungs and clinical outcome: Results of an alternative allocation algorithm

      Background

      Despite the scarcity of donor lungs, most potential donor organs are not offered by organ procurement organizations or are turned down by transplant centers because no suitable recipient is found according to regular allocation. Although extended criteria donors (ECDs) have recently been considered by many programs, the lung utilization rate remains < 30% in most countries. The allocation policy of Eurotransplant for donor lungs that have been turned down for donor-related medical reasons by 3 centers is to attempt a rescue offer, for which centers choose the recipients themselves. At Hannover Medical School we systematically divert these organs to more stable recipients to avoid adverse transplant outcomes. We follow up on these transplants and compare them with those following regular allocation.

      Methods

      This study is an analysis of all organ offers and corresponding recipients at our center during the period from January 2010 to August 2011.

      Results

      A total of 183 lung transplantations were performed, 111 regular donor lung offers were accepted for their intended recipient, whereas a total of 72 rescue lung offers, including all extended criteria donors, were accepted for recipients selected by our center. Donor characteristics differed between the 2 groups accordingly. Median age of ECD organ donors was significantly higher than that of regular donors (46.0 [IQR 21] vs 40.0 [IQR 22] years, p = 0.02). Donor mechanical ventilation time did not differ (3.5 ± 4.8 vs 3.0 ± 4.0 days, p = 0.33, not statistically significant [NS]). Donor oxygenation ratio (PaO2:FIO2) at time of organ offer was significantly lower (398.3 ± 110.3 vs 423.0 ± 97.6 mm Hg, p = 0.02). Recipients of rescue allocation organs were older than regularly selected recipients (53.7 ± 11.7 vs 46.7 ± 15.4 years, p = 0.0003), needed a shorter time for mechanical ventilation post-operatively (19.5 ± 306.6 vs 68.5 ± 718.8 hours, p = 0.02), and had shorter hospital stays (24.0 ± 23.4 vs 47.0 ± 43.4 days, p > 0.0001). Intensive care stay length did not differ significantly (2.0 ± 14.5 vs 5.0 ± 23.7 days, p = 0.21 [NS]). Post-operative survival up to 27 months after transplantation was not worse in recipients receiving rescue allocation when compared with standard allocation lung offers (81.62% vs 80.76%, p = 0.89 [NS]). The pre-operative status of the 2 recipient cohorts differed considerably, as indicated by the standard allocation group consisting of 65.8% “high-urgency” (HU)-listed patients, whereas the rescue offers were used for only 11.1% of HU-listed recipients, reflecting our center’s policy.

      Conclusions

      Rescue allocation donor lungs can be used safely for transplantation and therefore salvaged for the donor pool. The data support our policy of accepting marginal donor lungs for stable recipients. This practice leads to very good overall survival.

      Keywords

      To read this article in full you will need to make a payment

      Purchase one-time access:

      Academic and Personal
      One-time access price info
      • For academic or personal research use, select 'Academic and Personal'
      • For corporate R&D use, select 'Corporate R&D Professionals'

      Subscribe:

      Subscribe to The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
      Already a print subscriber? Claim online access
      Already an online subscriber? Sign in
      Institutional Access: Sign in to ScienceDirect

      References

        • Roels L.
        • Rahmel A.
        The European experience.
        Transpl Int. 2011; 24: 350-367
      1. Eurotransplant annual report 2010. www.Eurotransplant.org. Accessed March 22, 2013

        • Meers C.
        • van Raemdonck D.
        • Verleden G.
        • et al.
        The number of lung transplants can be safely doubled using extended criteria donors; a single-center review.
        Transpl Int. 2010; 23: 628-635
        • Botha P.
        • Trivedi D.
        • Weir C.
        • et al.
        Extended donor criteria in lung transplantation: impact on organ allocation.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2006; 131: 1154-1160
        • Aigner C.
        • Winkler G.
        • Jaksch P.
        • et al.
        Extended donor criteria for lung transplantation—a clinical reality.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27: 757
      2. (Eurotransplant: Donation, waiting lists, and transplants)Oosterlee A. Rahmel A. Annual report 2009 of the Eurotransplant International Foundation. Eurotransplant International Foundation, Leiden, The Netherlands2009
        • van Raemdonck D.
        • Nyrinck A.
        • Verleden G.M.
        • et al.
        Lung donor selection and management.
        Proc Am Thorac Soc. 2009; 6: 28
        • Hornby K.
        • Ross H.
        • Keshavjee S.
        • et al.
        Non-utilization of hearts and lungs after consent for donation: a Canadian multicentre study.
        Can J Anesth. 2006; 53: 831
        • Frost A.E.
        Donor criteria and evaluation.
        Clin Chest Med. 1997; 18: 231-237
        • Lardinois D.
        • Banysch M.
        • Korom S.
        • et al.
        Extended donor lungs: eleven years experience in a consecutive series.
        Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005; 27: 762-767
        • Reyes K.G.
        • Mason D.P.
        • Thuita L.
        • et al.
        Guidelines for donor lung selection: time for revision?.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2010; 89: 1756-1764
        • de Perrot M.
        • Liu M.
        • Waddell T.
        • et al.
        Ischemia-reperfusion-induced lung injury.
        Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 2003; 167: 490-511
        • Bonser R.S.
        • Taylor R.
        • Collett D.
        • et al.
        Effect of donor smoking on survival after lung transplantation: a cohort study of prospective registry.
        Lancet. 2012; 380: 747-755
        • Smits J.M.
        • van der Bij W.
        • van Raemdonck D.
        • et al.
        Defining an extended criteria donor lung: an empirical approach based on the Eurotransplant experience.
        Transpl Int. 2011; 24: 393-400
        • Mason D.P.
        • Thuita L.
        • Nowicki E.R.
        • et al.
        Should lung transplantation be performed for patients on mechanical respiratory support? The US experience.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010; 139: 765-773
        • Hadjiliadis D.
        • Steele M.P.
        • Govert J.A.
        • et al.
        Outcome of lung transplant patients admitted to the medical ICU.
        Chest. 2004; 125: 1040-1045
        • Bermudez C.A.
        • Rocha R.V.
        • Zaldonis D.
        • et al.
        Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation as a bridge to lung transplant: midterm outcomes.
        Ann Thorac Surg. 2011; 92: 1226-1231
        • McCurry K.R.
        • Shearon T.H.
        • Edwards L.B.
        • et al.
        Lung transplantation in the United States, 1998-2007.
        Am J Transplant. 2009; 9: 942-958
        • Lingaraju R.
        • Blumenthal N.P.
        • Kotloff R.M.
        • et al.
        Effects of lung allocation score on waiting list rankings and transplant procedures.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006; 25: 1167-1170
        • Kawut S.M.
        • Reyentovich A.
        • Wilt J.S.
        • et al.
        Outcomes of extended donor lung recipients after lung transplantation.
        Transplantation. 2005; 79: 310-316
        • Sundaresan S.
        • Semenkovich J.
        • Ochoa L.
        • et al.
        Successful outcome of lung transplantation is not compromised by the use of marginal donor lungs.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 1075-1079
        • Pierre A.F.
        • Sekine Y.
        • Hutcheon M.
        • et al.
        Evaluation of extended donor and recipient criteria for lung transplantation.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2001; 20: 256
        • Thabut G.
        • Mal H.
        • Cerrina J.
        • et al.
        Influence of donor characteristics on outcome after lung transplantation: a multicenter study.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2005; 24: 1347-1353
        • Mascia L.
        • Pasero D.
        • Slutsky A.S.
        • et al.
        Effect of a lung protective strategy for organ donors on eligibility and availability of lungs for transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.
        JAMA. 2010; 304: 2620-2627
        • Powner D.J.
        • Darby J.M.
        • Stuart S.A.
        Recommendations for mechanical ventilation during donor care.
        Prog Transplant. 2000; 10: 33-38
        • Mattner F.
        • Kola A.
        • Fischer S.
        • et al.
        Impact of bacterial and fungal donor organ contamination in lung, heart-lung, heart and liver transplantation.
        Infection. 2008; 36: 207-212
        • Straznicka M.
        • Follette D.M.
        • Eisner M.D.
        • et al.
        Aggressive management of lung donors classified as unacceptable: excellent recipient survival one year after transplantation.
        J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002; 124: 250-258
      3. Horai T, Shigemura N, Gries C, et al. Lung transplantation for patients with high lung allocation score: single-center experience. Ann Thorac Surg.

        • Merlo C.A.
        • Weiss E.S.
        • Orens J.B.
        • et al.
        Impact of U.S. Lung allocation score on survival after lung transplantation.
        J Heart Lung Transplant. 2009; 28: 769-775
        • Singer J.P.
        • Blanc P.D.
        • Hoopes C.
        • et al.
        The impact of pretransplant mechanical ventilation on short- and long-term survival after lung transplantation.
        Am J Transplant. 2011; 11: 2197-2204
        • Schiavon M.
        • Falcoz P.E.
        • Santelmo N.
        • et al.
        Does the use of extended criteria donors influence early and long-term result of lung transplantation?.
        Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2012; 14: 183-187