The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 11 , Pages 1245-1252, November 2010

Echocardiographic assessment of flow across continuous-flow ventricular assist devices at low speeds

  • Robert S. George, BSc, BM, MRCS

      Affiliations

    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Department, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
    • Heart Science Centre, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
    • Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Leeds General Infirmary, Leeds, UK
  • ,
  • Nikant K. Sabharwal, MRCP, DM

      Affiliations

    • Echocardiography Department, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Carole Webb, BSc

      Affiliations

    • Echocardiography Department, Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Trust, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Magdi H. Yacoub, FRS

      Affiliations

    • Heart Science Centre, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Christopher T. Bowles, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Department, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Michael Hedger, RN

      Affiliations

    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Department, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Asghar Khaghani, FRCS

      Affiliations

    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Department, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
  • ,
  • Emma J. Birks, FRCP, PhD

      Affiliations

    • Mechanical Circulatory Support Department, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
    • Heart Science Centre, Imperial College, Uxbridge, UK
    • University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Emma J. Birks, FRCP, PhD, University of Louisville, 201 Abraham Flexner Way, Suite 1200, Louisville, KY 40222. Telephone: 502-561-2180. Fax: 502-561-2190

published online 06 August 2010.

Background

Testing of native myocardial function in patients with continuous-flow pumps is challenging as reduction/cessation of the pump could result in regurgitation, although the amount and significance of this regurgitation remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine the optimal speed at which to assess the native left ventricular (LV) function and the physiologic response to speed reduction.

Methods

Fifteen male patients with a HeartMate II (HMII) device were studied prospectively on 46 occasions. Measurements were performed serially at three device speed settings: baseline speed; 6,000 rpm; and either 5,000 rpm (Group A) or 4,000 rpm (Group B). The device's forward and reverse velocity (Vmaxf, Vmaxr), forward and reverse velocity time integral (VTIf, VTIr) and blood volume (BV) were also measured using Doppler with LV echocardiographic parameters and peripheral hemodynamics.

Results

No adverse incidents were reported. Speed reduction to 6,000 rpm resulted in a significant decrease in Vmaxf, VTIf and BV. There was no significant difference in either forward or reverse flow with further speed reduction in either group. Speed reduction to <6,000 rpm did not have a significant effect on LV loading.

Conclusions

Speed reduction in patients with the HMII device is safe. There was no difference between 6,000 rpm and lower speeds, suggesting that 6,000 rpm is sufficient to assess native myocardial function. The absence of significant retrograde filling suggests that LV loading is a physiologic response to speed reduction at 6,000 rpm.

Keywords: echocardiography, heart failure, forward flow, reverse flow, ventricular assist device

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-2498(10)00356-6

doi:10.1016/j.healun.2010.05.032

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 11 , Pages 1245-1252, November 2010