The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 6 , Pages 599-602 , June 2010

Gene expression profiling and cardiac allograft rejection monitoring: Is IMAGE just a mirage?

  • Mandeep R. Mehra, MD

      Affiliations

    • University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Mandeep R. Mehra, MD, University of Maryland Medical Center, 22 S Greene St, Rm S3B06, Baltimore, MD 21201. Telephone: 410-328-2056. Fax: 410-328-4382
  • ,
  • Jayan Parameshwar, MD

      Affiliations

    • Papworth Hospital, Papworth Everard, Cambridge, United Kingdom

  • Image Result

    Time-dependent risk of cardiac rejection requires dynamic surveillance strategies: The 3 distinct periods of immunologic adjustment (early), allograft adaptation, and then the stable phase of allograf

    Time-dependent risk of cardiac rejection requires dynamic surveillance strategies: The 3 distinct periods of immunologic adjustment (early), allograft adaptation, and then the stable phase of allograft maintenance require distinct vigilance strategies. Early on, a very concerted and aggressive strategy is required while adjustment of immunosuppression is underway. In Months 2 to 6, as allograft adaptation ensues, risk stratification for intense vs less intense strategies may be needed, perhaps guided by the predictive ability of gene-expression testing. In the maintenance phase, a clinical and functional evaluation structured approach may be adequate.

PII: S1053-2498(10)00266-4

doi: 10.1016/j.healun.2010.04.010

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 6 , Pages 599-602 , June 2010