The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 568-573, May 2010

Induced pulsation of a continuous-flow total artificial heart in a mock circulatory system

  • Hassan A. Khalil, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Daniel T. Kerr, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • Mark A. Schusterman II, BS

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • William E. Cohn, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
  • ,
  • O.H. Frazier, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: O.H. Frazier, MD, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, Texas Heart Institute, P.O. Box 20345, MC 3-147, Houston, TX 77225-0345. Telephone: 832-355-3000. Fax: 832-355-6798
  • ,
  • Branislav Radovancevic, MD

      Affiliations

    • Cardiovascular Surgical Research Laboratories, Texas Heart Institute at St. Luke's Episcopal Hospital, Houston, Texas
    • The University of Texas Medical School at Houston, Houston, Texas

published online 16 February 2010.

Background

We studied the hemodynamic effects of inducing an artificial pulse in a continuous-flow total artificial heart consisting of 2 axial-flow pumps in a mock circulatory system.

Methods

We varied the amplitude (maximum minus minimum speed), beat rate and systolic duration of the left pump, right pump or both. Mean left and right pump speeds were maintained at 11 and 8 krpm, respectively. Flow rates and arterial and filling pressures were measured in the systemic and pulmonary portions of the mock circulation. Pulse pressure, pulse flow, pulsatility index and surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE) were calculated. The percent change in mean left atrial pressure (LAP) during each induced pulsatility condition was compared with that observed during continuous flow.

Results

Systemic pulse pressures of 17 to 61 mm Hg were attained when the left pump was pulsed, regardless of right pump pulsatility settings. The pulse pressure was directly related to the systolic duration and inversely related to the left pump beat rate. SHE ranged from 0.1 to 3.0 mm Hg, and its changes were comparable to those in pulse pressure. The LAP was reduced by left pump pulsation, but a maximal reduction (≤77%) relative to continuous flow was achieved when the two pumps were copulsed or counterpulsed at a slow rate (10 bpm).

Conclusions

This approach provided maximal flow pulsatility and an adequate reduction in LAP, which may be elevated in recipients of a cardiac replacement device. Further bench and in vivo experiments are needed to assess pump synchronization modes.

Keywords: total artificial heart, mechanical circulatory support, induced pulsatility, perfusion–nonpulsatile, perfusion–pulsatile, mechanical modeling

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-2498(09)01525-3

doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.12.004

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 568-573, May 2010