The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 538-543, May 2010

Gal knockout pig pericardium: New source of material for heart valve bioprostheses

  • Nermine Lila, DVM, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Paris Descartes, Laboratory of Biosurgical Researches, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
    • Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Nermine Lila, DVM, PhD, University Paris Descartes, Laboratory of Biosurgical Researches, Georges Pompidou Hospital, 56 rue Leblanc 75015 Paris, France. Telephone: 33-1-56-09-59-07. Fax: 33-1-56-09-59-03
  • ,
  • Christopher G.A. McGregor, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Sophie Carpentier, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Paris Descartes, Laboratory of Biosurgical Researches, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Jeanne Rancic

      Affiliations

    • University Paris Descartes, Laboratory of Biosurgical Researches, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
  • ,
  • Guerard W. Byrne, PhD

      Affiliations

    • William J. von Liebig Transplant Center, Mayo Clinic Rochester, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
  • ,
  • Alain Carpentier, MD, PhD

      Affiliations

    • University Paris Descartes, Laboratory of Biosurgical Researches, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France
    • Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Cardiovascular Surgery and Organ Transplantation, Georges Pompidou Hospital, Paris, France

published online 28 December 2009.

Background

Although glutaraldehyde fixation is known to reduce immunogenicity and degeneration of heart valve bioprostheses, some degree of immunogenicity persists, which may trigger calcification. The aims of this study were to: (1) define the role of alpha-1,3-galactosyltransferase (α-Gal) antigen in valve calcification by comparing α-Gal–positive and α-Gal–deficient (GT-KO) pig pericardium; and (2) elucidate the role of human anti-Gal antibodies in the process of calcification and to determine the potential influence of different tissue-fixation techniques.

Methods

Glutaraldehyde-treated pericardium from α-Gal–positive and GT-KO pigs, with or without pre-labeling with human anti-Gal antibodies, were implanted in rats during 1 month.

Results

In glutaraldehyde-fixed pericardium, calcification levels were significantly lower in GT-KO pig pericardium (132.8 ± 5.8 μg/mg) as compared with α-Gal–positive pig pericardium (155.7 ± 7.1 μg/mg) (p < 0.015). In glutaraldehyde-fixed pig pericardium followed by a mix of formaldehyde, ethanol and Tween 80 (FET), the calcification levels were lower in GT-KO pig pericardium (0.35 ± 0.1 μg/mg) as compared with α-Gal–positive pig pericardium (4.6 ± 4.2 μg/mg). In glutaraldehyde-fixed pig pericardium + FET pre-incubated with human anti-Gal antibodies, calcification levels were significantly greater in α-Gal–positive pig pericardium (43.8 ± 8.5 μg/mg) as compared with GT-KO pig pericardium (5.7 ± 2.9 μg/mg) (p < 0.0001).

Conclusions

This study demonstrates the role of α-Gal antigen and human α-Gal antibodies in the calcification process of valvular bioprostheses. It is suggested that GT-KO pig pericardium could be beneficial as a new source of material for heart valve bioprostheses.

Keywords: heart valve bioprostheses, immunogenicity, calcification, alpha-gal, anti-gal antibodies

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-2498(09)00819-5

doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.10.007

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 29, Issue 5 , Pages 538-543, May 2010