Journal Home
Search for

Volume 29, Issue 3, Pages 240-246 (March 2010)


View previous. 3 of 28 View next.

Factors indicative of long-term survival after lung transplantation: A review of 836 10-year survivors

Presented at the Twenty-ninth Annual Meeting and Scientific Sessions of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation, Paris, France, April 22–25, 2009.

Eric S. Weiss, MD, MPHa, Jeremiah G. Allen, MDa, Christian A. Merlo, MD, MPHbc, John V. Conte, MDa, Ashish S. Shah, MDaCorresponding Author Informationemail address

published online 23 November 2009.

Introduction

Despite 20 years of lung transplantation (LTx), factors influencing long-term survival remain largely unknown. The United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) data set provides an opportunity to examine long-term LTx survivors.

Methods

We conducted a case-control study embedded within the prospectively collected UNOS LTx cohort to identify 836 adults from 1987 to 1997 who survived ≥10 years after first LTx. LTx patients within the same era and surviving 1 to 5 years served as controls. Multivariable logistic regression with incorporation of spline terms evaluated the odds of being a 10-year survivor. Two separate models were constructed. Model A incorporated pre-operative, operative, and donor-specific factors. Model B incorporated the factors used in Model A with post-operative covariates. Additional outcomes evaluated included hospitalizations for infection, rejection, and bronchiolitis obliterans.

Results

Of 4,818 LTx patients from 1987 to 1997, 836 (17.3%) survived ≥10 years with a mean follow-up of 148.8 ± 21.6 months. Mean follow-up for 1,657 controls was 34.0 ± 13.9 months. The distribution of 10-year survivors by disease was cystic fibrosis, 170 (20%); chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 254 (30%); and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, 92 (11%). On multivariable logistic regression, significant factors influencing 10-year survival included age ≤35 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.07, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.03–1.11; p = 0.01), bilateral LTx (OR. 1.71; 95% CI, 1.25–2.34; p = 0.001), and hospitalizations for infections (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27–1.54; p < 0.001) and for rejection (OR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.48–0.65; p < 0.001).

Conclusions

Examination of a cohort of long-term LTx survivors in the UNOS data set indicates that bilateral LTx and fewer hospitalizations for rejection may portend improved long-term survival after LTx.

Article Outline

Abstract

Methods

Data source

Study design

Analysis

Results

Study groups

Baseline characteristics

Follow-up

Multivariable logistic regression

Interaction between infection and rejection

Discussion

Multivariable model

Bilateral vs single LT

Hospitalizations for rejection and infection

Limitations

Conclusions

Disclosure Statement

References

Copyright

It is well supported that the greatest risk of death after lung transplantation (LTx) occurs in the first year.1 Despite this, close to 80% of patients survive and thrive well beyond this first year after LTx.1 Factors influencing survival in these patients are of substantial interest, and consequently, several clinical investigations have focused specifically on this issue.2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 Registry data have revealed that once patients survive to 1 year after LTx, several factors are associated with increased 5-year mortality. These include recipient diagnosis, history of diabetes mellitus, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) match level, donor cause of death, and several post-transplant outcomes, including development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome (BOS), rejection, and infection.1

It is noteworthy that among patients who do survive 1 year after LTx, substantial differences are found in length of overall survival. Although previous studies and registry data help differentiate patients who die early from those who reach benchmark lengths of survival (ie, 5 years), they do not distinguish long-term survival from intermediate survival. It is likely, for example, that distinct differences exist between a patient who survives 12 years after LTx from one who dies at 5 years.

To address this question, we report results from a case-control study using data obtained from an open cohort of LTx recipients followed up within the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. Our purpose was to examine those factors associated with extended survival after LTX of ≥10 years compared with intermediate survival of 1 to 5 years.

Methods 

return to Article Outline

Data source 

We were provided Standard Transplant Analysis and Research (STAR) files from the UNOS registry. The data set comprises an open cohort of all patients undergoing LTx in the United States. No patient or center identifiers were included in this analysis and the study was granted Investigational Review Board exemption at our institution.

Study design 

The design was a case-control study embedded within the prospectively collected UNOS open cohort (case-cohort design). Cases were adult patients (aged >17 years) receiving initial LTx between 1987 and 1997 who survived at least 10 years after LTx (Figure 1). Controls were patients who received an allograft within the same era (1987–1997) and died between 1 and 5 years after LTx. Patients were excluded who survived less than 1 year and those who survived between 6 and 9 years. Also excluded were patients who survived 1 to 5 years but were lost to follow-up to limit potential selection bias in the analysis relating to factors predicting loss to follow-up rather than factors predicting death.


View full-size image.

Figure 1. Flowchart shows the study design.


Analysis 

The outcome of interest was 10-year survival vs 1- to 5-year survival. A multivariable logistic regression model predicting the odds of 10-year survival was constructed incorporating covariates of interest. After all covariates were tested in a univariate analysis, the multivariable logistic regression model was developed by incorporating well-represented covariates (<10% missing data) with the potential for confounding based on biologic plausibility. Lowess smoothing plots evaluated linear breakpoints for continuous variables, and spline terms were added to the model when appropriate. The likelihood ratio test for significance was used in a nested model approach to assess appropriateness of covariate inclusion.

Two models were constructed from the data set. The initial model, Model A, incorporated pre-operative, operative, and donor-specific factors. The second model, Model B, incorporated those factors in Model A plus additional post-operative factors All models were examined using the area under the receiver operating curve (ROC) along with the Akaike information criterion and Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) goodness of fit test. Model accuracy was assessed using “leave one out” cross validation with 1,845 separate replications.9 A cross-validated HL goodness of fit chi-square statistic was calculated for this purpose. Collinearity was assessed by incorporating the final covariates into a multivariable linear regression model predicting a randomly generated number allowing calculation of variance inflation factors. To assess importance of missing data, multiple imputation was performed on the final model, and significant covariates were compared with the model constructed using case-wise deletion.

The final model (Model B) included the following covariates: age, age spline term with a cut-point at 35 years, recipient sex, recipient primary diagnosis, mean annual institutional volume, bilateral LTx (BLT) vs single LTx (SLT), HLA level, panel reactive antigen (PRA) level, development of BOS during follow-up, and number of hospitalizations for rejection and infection.

Univariate analysis for continuous data was conducted using the t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test for non-parametric data. The chi-square test was used for comparison of categoric variables. For all analyses, a 2-tailed value of p < 0.05 was considered significant. Means are presented with standard deviations, medians with interquartile ranges (IQR), and all odds ratios (OR) are presented with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Statistical analyses were performed with the aid of STATA 9.2SE software (StataCorp LP, College Station, TX).

Results 

return to Article Outline

Study groups 

From 1987 until 2002, 5,273 patients received LTx. Exclusion of 323 children, 133 re-LTx patients, and those who did not meet study eligibility (ie, 1,235 patients surviving <1 year after LTx, 846 surviving 6 to 9 years, and 554 lost to follow-up) yielded a study population of 2,182 (Figure 1). Of these, 836 patients (17.3%) were 10-year survivors. The controls were 1,346 patients who survived 1 to 5 years. Although the number of 10-year survivors increased dramatically between 1987 and 1990, the number remained constant after 1990, comprising approximately 15% to 20% of all LTx recipients (Figure 2). The number of 5-year survivors increased steadily during the decade.


View full-size image.

Figure 2. Percentage of lung transplant (LTx) recipients surviving 10 years and 5 years from 1987 to 1997.


Baseline characteristics 

Cases and controls differed in several important baseline characteristics. Specifically, 10-year survivors were younger, more likely to have cystic fibrosis (CF) as their primary diagnosis, and were more likely to be white than controls (Table 1). Conversely, fewer patients in the 10-year survival group had idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) as the primary diagnosis. Variables relating to acuity such as creatinine, oxygen requirement at baseline, and percentage of patients with pre-operative diabetes mellitus did not differ between cases and controls (Table 1).

Table 1.

Baseline Characteristics and Demographics Among 10-year Survivors and 1- to 5-year Survivors (1987–1997)

Variables
10-year survivors N = 836
1–5 year survivors N = 1,346
p-valuea
Recipient demographics
Age, mean ± SD, years44.0±11.547.8±12.5<0.001
Females, No. (%)445/836(53.2)680/1346(50.3)0.28
White race, No. (%)777/836(92.9)1214/1343(90.4)0.04
Mean institutional volume15.1±11.713.3±10.7<0.001
Primary diagnosis, No. (%)
Cystic fibrosis170/836(20.3)170/1346(12.6)<0.001
COPD254/836(30.4)623/1346(46.3)<0.001
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis92/836(11.0)205/1346(15.2)0.005
Primary pulmonary hypertension66/836(7.9)77/1346(5.7)<0.001
Other254/836(30.4)271/1346(20.1)0.05
Recipient O2 (L/min) support, comorbidities
O2 (L/min) requirement, mean ± SD, liters/min2.35±1.642.50±1.710.09
Body mass index, mean ± SD, kg/m222.5±5.123.2±5.3<0.001
Diabetes mellitus, No. (%)20/404(5.0)39/664(5.9)0.52
Creatinine, (mg/dL) mean ± SD, mg/dl0.89±0.500.96±0.940.70
Transplant variables, No. (%)
BLT (overall)437/836(52.3)428/1344(31.8)<0.001
BLT by age in years, No. (%)
18–35166/196(84.7)190/232(81.9)0.44
35–50177/310(57.1)128/360(35.6)<0.001
>5071/290(24.5)87/589(12.6)<0.001
BLT by major diagnosis types, No. (%)
Cystic fibrosis168(99.4)168(99.0)0.60
COPD67(26.4)97(15.6)<0.001
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis27(29.4)30(14.6)0.003
Primary pulmonary hypertension41/66(62.1)43/76(56.6)0.50
Other133/254(52.4)90/270(33.3)<0.001
HLA match, No. (%)
0 antigen match168/688(24.4)341/1123(30.4)0.005
1 antigen match258/688(27.5)451/1123(40.2)0.20
2 antigen match182/688(26.5)235/1123(20.9)0.01
≥3 antigen match80/688(11.6)96/1123(8.6)0.04
Panel reactive antibody levels
0%637/787(80.9)1003/1279(78.4)0.38
1% to 10%124/787(15.8)208/1279(16.3)0.69
11% to 25%13/787(1.7)36/1279(2.8)0.09
>25%13/787(1.7)32/1279(2.5)0.19

BLT, bilateral lung transplantation; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; SD, standard deviation.

a

Based on results of either t-test or Wilcoxon rank sum test as appropriate for continuous variables or chi-square test for categoric variables. Values of p < 0.05 are significant.

Overall, 52.3% of the 10-year survivors received bilateral lung transplantation (BLT) compared with 31.8% in controls (p < 0.001; Table 1). When this was stratified by age, the association between BLT and 10-year survival only occurred for those patients aged older than 35. In addition, when stratified by primary diagnosis, only patients with COPD (26.4% vs 15.6%, p < 0.001), IPF (29.4% vs. 14.6%, p = 0.003), and other pathologies (52.4% vs. 33.3%, p < 0.001) had an increased use of BLT. Thus, BLT did not appear to be associated with 10-year survival in younger patients and those with CF.

HLA match levels appeared to be associated with 10-year survival, because cases were more likely to have at least 2 HLAs matched between donor and recipient than controls (Table 1). Although no significant association between PRA and 10-year survival was noted, only 1.7% of 10-year survivors had PRA levels greater than 10%.

Follow-up 

An examination of follow-up variables revealed further differences between cases and controls (Table 2). The 10-year survivors had fewer hospitalizations for rejection but more hospitalizations for infection compared with controls. Overall oxygen requirements during the course of follow-up were 0.8 liters/min lower in 10-year survivors than in the 1- to 5-year survivors (p < 0.001). BOS developed in 10-year survivors with increased frequency compared with 1- to 5-year survivors, likely relating to their longer survival (60.1% vs 45.3%, p < 0.001). Despite this increased prevalence, however, 10-year survivors did not die of BOS as frequently as controls (14.6% vs 29.8%, p < 0.001). The leading cause of death in the 10-year survivor group was non-specific respiratory failure, and a greater percentage of 10-year survivors died of malignancy than 1- to 5-year survivors.

Table 2.

Univariate Comparison of Follow-up Variables Between 10-year Survivors and 1- and 5-year Survivors

Variable
Survival
p-valuea
10-years1–5 years (1987–1997)
N = 836N = 1,346
BOS development503(60.1)702(45.3)<0.001
Hospitalizations, mean ± SD, No.
For infection1.65±1.731.01±1.07<0.001
For rejection0.53±0.880.66±0.85<0.001
O2 (L/min) requirement at F/U, mean ± SD0.19±0.540.99±1.81<0.001
Patients who died, No. (%)268(32.1)1346(100)NAb
Causes of death, No. (%)
BOS39(14.6)401(29.8)<0.001
Acute rejection0(0)18(1.3)0.02
Infection39(14.6)291(21.6)0.003
Respiratory failure non-specific43(26.0)122(9.1)0.008
Malignancy32(11.9)91(6.8)0.003
Renal failure8(3.0)24(1.8)0.2
Multisystem organ failure14(5.2)55(4.1)0.5
Cardiovascular disease12(4.5)45(3.3)0.5
Other known57(21.3)231(17.1)0.21
Unknown24(9.0)68(5.1)0.001

BOS, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; F/U, follow-up; SD, standard deviation.

a

Value of p based on results of t-test for continuous variables or chi-square test for categoric variables. Significance set at p < 0.05.

b

This value of p not applicable due to method of control selection.

Multivariable logistic regression 

Multivariable logistic regression models were constructed comparing 10-year survivors with controls (Table 3). The initial model was calibrated with a set of covariates followed by extension to post-operative factors (Models A and B). On univariate analysis, as well as in both the base model (Model A) and extended model (Model B), age 18 to 35 years was associated with an increase in the odds of 10-year survival. In addition, the spline term at age 35 was significant; indicating that 35 years is indeed a significant breakpoint in prediction of 10-year survival. In all models, the odds of 10-year survival were decreased in patients aged older than 35. Furthermore, all models revealed BLT to be strongly associated with an increase in the odds of 10-year survival. Mean center volume (OR, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01–1.03; p < 0.001 for each one case/year decrease) and higher levels of HLA matching (OR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.07–2.42; p = 0.02) were both strongly associated with an increase in the odds of 10-year survival. On a graphic examination of mean hospital volume, no level was found to serve as a threshold for optimizing the odds of 10-year survival.

Table 3.

Univariate and Multivariable Logistic Regression Predicting Odds of 10-year Survival vs 1- to 5-year Survival

Covariates of interest
Univariate analysis OR (95% CI)
p-value
Multivariable analysisa OR (95% CI)
p-value
Multivariable analysisb OR (95% CI)
p-value
Pre-op/operative variables
Age 18–35 years1.07(1.03–1.09)<0.0011.08(1.04–1.12)<0.0011.07(1.03–1.11)0.01
Age >35 years0.95(0.94–0.96)<0.0010.98(0.96–0.99)0.010.97(0.95–1.00)0.03
Age spline coef. at 350.89(0.86–0.92)<0.0010.91(0.87–0.95)<0.0010.92(0.88–0.96)0.01
Female sex 0.93(0.74–1.15)0.500.92(0.74–1.16)0.26
Primary diagnosis
COPDReference Reference Reference
Cystic fibrosis2.45(1.89–3.17)<0.0011.47(0.92–2.34)0.111.54(0.95–2.51)0.08
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis1.10(0.83–1.46)0.511.02(0.70–1.48)0.931.07(0.72–1.58)0.74
PPH2.10(1.47–3.01)<0.0011.43(0.89–2.31)0.141.74(1.06–2.85)0.03
Other2.30(1.84–2.88)<0.0011.62(1.20–2.20)0.0021.74(1.26–2.39)0.001
Mean annual center volume1.02(1.01–1.03)<0.0011.01(1.00–1.02)0.0091.02(1.01–1.03)<0.001
BLT2.34(1.96–2.80)<0.0011.84(1.36–2.48)<0.0011.71(1.25–2.34)0.001
BMI0.97(0.96–0.99)0.0020.98(0.96–1.00)0.090.98(0.95–1.00)0.07
HLA match
0Reference Reference Reference
11.16(0.91–1.48)0.221.18(0.90–1.54)0.231.12(0.85–1.49)0.4
21.57(1.20–2.05)0.0011.61(1.19–2.17)0.0021.58(1.16–2.17)0.004
≥31.69(1.19–2.40)0.0031.73(1.17–2.56)0.0061.61(1.07–2.42)0.02
Ischemic time
<2.5 hours0.62(0.44–0.87)0.0070.67(0.44–1.02)0.060.59(0.38–0.94)0.02
≥2.5 hours1.20(1.13–1.27)<0.0011.04(0.96–1.130.281.03(0.95–1.13)0.4
Spline at 2.5 hours of ischemic time1.94(1.33–2.82)<0.0011.56(0.99–2.46)0.061.73(1.08–2.78)0.02
PRA levels
0%Reference Reference Reference
1%–10%0.94(0.74–1.20)0.611.00(0.74–1.34)0.980.96(0.70–1.31)0.79
11%–25%0.57(0.30–1.08)0.090.56(0.27–1.15)0.110.61(0.29–1.28)0.19
>25%0.64(0.33–1.23)0.180.46(0.21–1.00)0.050.46(0.21–1.03)0.06
Follow-up variables
BOS1.78(1.48–2.10)<0.001NA 1.78(1.40–2.26)<0.001
Hospitalizations
For infection1.29(1.21–1.37)<0.001NA 1.40(1.27–1.54)<0.001
For rejection0.80(0.72–0.89)<0.001NA 0.55(0.48–0.65)<0.001
Model fit
AUROCNA 0.670.73
HL chi-squareNA 10.580.2313.30.1
McFaddens pseudo-R2NA 0.050.1

AUROC, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve; BLT, bilateral lung transplantation; BMI, body mass index; BOS, bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome; CI, confidence interval; COPD, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; HL, Hosmer-Lemeshow; HLA, human leukocyte antigen; NA, not applicable; OR, odds ratio; PPH, primary pulmonary hypertension; PRA, panel reactive antibody.

a

Multivariable logistic regression model incorporating the following pre-operative and operative covariates: age 18–35, age spline at 35, sex, primary diagnosis, mean annual institutional volume, bilateral vs single LTx, BMI, HLA match level, ischemic time <2.5 hours, spline term at ischemic time of 2.5 hours, and PRA.

b

Multivariable logistic regression model incorporating all covariates in model a, plus the following follow-up covariates: number of hospitalizations for infections, number of hospitalizations for rejection, and development of any grade of BOS.

When post-operative covariates were included (Model B), each increase of 1 hospitalization for rejection decreased the odds of 10-year survival by 45% (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48–0.65; p < 0.001). The final model incorporated 15 covariates with a C-index of 0.73 and pseudo-R2 value of 0.1 (Table 3). Furthermore, the non-significant HL chi-square statistic of 13.3 (p = 0.1) indicated that the final model appropriately fit the data.

Interaction between infection and rejection 

In Model B, each hospitalization for infection increased the odds of 10-year survival by 40% (OR 1.40; 95% CI, 1.27–1.54; p < 0.001). Because of the counterintuitive nature of this finding, an interaction term between hospitalizations for infection and rejection was added to investigate the relationship between these 2 variables. Incorporation of this term revealed a positive and significant interaction between hospitalization for infection and rejection (OR 1.20; 95% CI, 1.04–1.37; p = 0.01). In this new model, rejection persisted as a significant covariate, with a 59% lower odds of 10-year survival with each additional hospitalization for rejection (OR, 0.41; 95% CI; 0.28–0.63; p < 0.001). However, hospitalizations for infection no longer predicted the outcome (OR, 1.11; 95% CI; 0.93–1.33; p = 0.3). This indicates that the observed association between infection and improved survival may be mediated by the associated decrease in rejection among those with increased immunosuppression.

Discussion 

return to Article Outline

This study examined factors associated with 10-year survival compared with 1- to 5-year survival for first-time LTx patients. This is a unique question in LTx that has not been thoroughly examined.

Only 836 patients (17.3% of the sample) survived 10 years after LTx. This number indicates that more than 80% of LTx patients will die within 10 years. Furthermore, the percentage of patients surviving 10 years did not vary substantially from 1987 to 1997. This indicates that although advances in LTx care from 1987 to 1997 have improved short-term survival, improvements in long-term survival remain elusive.

We found striking differences between 10-year survivors and controls at baseline. Although 10-year survivors were more likely to younger, white, and have a diagnosis of CF, 1- to 5-year survivors were more likely to be older and have IPF or COPD as the primary diagnosis. It was further noteworthy that 10-year survivors were more likely to have received a BLT. This was primarily in those patients who were aged older than 35 years with IPF and COPD.

Multivariable model 

Several points can be made from an examination of significant covariates present in the multivariable model. Specifically, age 18 to 35 years was associated with an increase in the odds of 10-year survival, but age older than 35 did not show an effect. The statistically significant spline term at 35 years indicated that age 35 was an important cut-point in explaining the outcome of interest.

Hospital volume emerged as a predictor of 10-year survival, with each 1 case/year increase translating into a 2% increase in the odds of 10-year survival. Several studies have evaluated the importance of institutional volume in transplantation outcomes, but most have focused on short-term mortality rates.10, 11 This study emphasizes the protective role that volume may have in long-term survival and stresses the importance of specialized providers and support systems present in large volume institutions.

Bilateral vs single LT 

An important finding from this study is that a higher percentage of 10-year survivors received BLT than controls. In the primary comparison between 10-year survivors and same era controls, BLT emerged as a significant predictor of 10-year survival in all logistic regression models. This relationship persisted after controlling for CF, a potential confounder given the nearly uniform BLT rate in this group. Among patients who survived 1 year or more, BLT was associated with doubling of the odds of 10-year survival. Many centers have adopted the use of BLT in LTx.1, 12, 13, 14 Potential therapeutic benefits of BLT include a reduction in alveolar damage during reperfusion, improved pulmonary compliance and mechanics, and the avoidance of native lung pathology.12, 15

Hospitalizations for rejection and infection 

It was not surprising that 10-year survivors had fewer hospitalizations for treatment of acute rejection during follow-up. Several studies examining LTx have found associations between acute rejection and BOS.2, 16 More interesting was the association between infection and long-term survival. Studies investigating the risk of infection with BOS and death have had mixed results. Some have linked the development of post-LTx non-cytomegalovirus infections to BOS and death,17, 18 whereas others have not.19, 20 Although infection may be an important mediator of early death, its effect on long-term survival is less clear. Patients surviving 10 years or longer did have an increased number of infectious hospitalizations with decreased hospitalizations for rejection. We found this association quite interesting, and further examination using the incorporation of an interaction term revealed the connection to be explained by a concomitant effect on hospitalizations for rejection. Hence, these data support the importance of avoiding acute rejection during follow-up, and may suggest a role for more aggressive immunosuppression regimens post-operatively.

Limitations 

Our study is limited by its use of the case-cohort design, which is retrospective in nature. We do not have control of all confounders. UNOS data are limited in the variables collected; and hence, there may be important variables not included in our analysis. Large data sets, like the one used in this study, rely on accurate coding, and we cannot confirm that errors in coding do not exist. However, we rely on the assumption that these errors are unlikely to bias results. Finally, we acknowledge that in this analysis we have eliminated information for patients that survived between 5 and 10 years after LTx. However, this was an a priori design strategy to examine differences in long-term and intermediate-term survival.

Conclusions 

We have presented an initial examination of differences between extended long-term and intermediate-term survival. Seventeen percent of our cohort survived 10 years after LTx. Avoidance of acute rejection, use of BLT, and increased hospital volume may lead to improved long-term survival in LTx.

Disclosure Statement 

return to Article Outline

Dr Weiss is the Irene Piccinini Investigator in Cardiac Surgery and Dr Allen is the Hugh R. Sharp Cardiac Surgery Research Fellow. This work was supported in part by Health Resources and Services Administration contract 234-2005-370011C and the National Institutes of Health (NIH 2T32DK007713–12 ESW). The content is the responsibility of the authors alone and does not necessarily reflect the views or policies of the Department of Health and Human Services, nor does mention of trade names, commercial products, or organizations imply endorsement by the U.S. government.

References 

return to Article Outline

1. 1Christie JD, Edwards LB, Aurora P, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-fifth official adult lung and heart/lung transplantation report—2008. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:957–969. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (1104 KB) | CrossRef

2. 2Sharples LD, McNeil K, Stewart S, Wallwork J. Risk factors for bronchiolitis obliterans: a systematic review of recent publications. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2002;21:271–281. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (81 KB) | CrossRef

3. 3Smits JM, Mertens BJ, Van Houwelingen HC, et al. Predictors of lung transplant survival in Eurotransplant. Am J Transplant. 2003;3:1400–1406. MEDLINE | CrossRef

4. 4Thabut G, Christie JD, Ravaud P, et al. Survival after bilateral versus single lung transplantation for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective analysis of registry data. Lancet. 2008;371:744–751. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (227 KB) | CrossRef

5. 5Trulock EP, Edwards LB, Taylor DO, et al. Registry of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation: twenty-third official adult lung and heart-lung transplantation report—2006. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2006;25:880–892. Full Text | Full-Text PDF (782 KB) | CrossRef

6. 6Weiss ES, Merlo CA, Shah AS. Impact of advanced age in lung transplantation: an analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing data. J Am Coll Surg. 2009;208:400–409. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (286 KB) | CrossRef

7. 7Weiss ES, Nwakanma LU, Russell SB, et al. Outcomes in bicaval versus biatrial techniques in heart transplantation: an analysis of the UNOS database. J Heart Lung Transplant. 2008;27:178–183. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (391 KB) | CrossRef

8. 8de Perrot M, Chaparro C, McRae K, et al. Twenty-year experience of lung transplantation at a single center: influence of recipient diagnosis on long-term survival. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2004;127:1493–1501. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (165 KB) | CrossRef

9. 9Thompson R. Crossval Version 1.0.1, (ado file for STATA Software). 1999.

10. 10Hosenpud JD, Breen TJ, Edwards EB, et al. The effect of transplant center volume on cardiac transplant outcome (A report of the United Network for Organ Sharing Scientific Registry). JAMA. 1994;271:1844–1849. MEDLINE

11. 11Weiss ES, Meguid RA, Patel ND, et al. Increased mortality at low-volume orthotopic heart transplantation centers: should current standards change?. Ann Thorac Surg. 2008;86:1250–1259discussion 1259–60. CrossRef

12. 12Hadjiliadis D, Angel LF. Controversies in lung transplantation: are two lungs better than one?. Semin Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;27:561–566. MEDLINE

13. 13Nwakanma LU, Simpkins CE, Williams JA, et al. Impact of bilateral versus single lung transplantation on survival in recipients 60 years of age and older: analysis of United Network for Organ Sharing database. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2007;133:541–547. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (488 KB) | CrossRef

14. 14Rinaldi M, Sansone F, Boffini M, et al. Single versus double lung transplantation in pulmonary fibrosis: a debated topic. Transplant Proc. 2008;40:2010–2012. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (55 KB) | CrossRef

15. 15Mason DP, Brizzio ME, Alster JM, et al. Lung transplantation for idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007;84:1121–1128. CrossRef

16. 16Kroshus TJ, Kshettry VR, Savik K, et al. Risk factors for the development of bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome after lung transplantation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1997;114:195–202. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (755 KB) | CrossRef

17. 17Bando K, Paradis IL, Similo S, et al. Obliterative bronchiolitis after lung and heart-lung transplantation (An analysis of risk factors and management). J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995;110:4–13discussion 13–4. Abstract | Full-Text PDF (1145 KB) | CrossRef

18. 18Heng D, Sharples LD, McNeil K, et al. Bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome: incidence, natural history, prognosis, and risk factors. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1998;17:1255–1263. MEDLINE

19. 19El-Gamel A, Sim E, Hasleton P, et al. Transforming growth factor beta (TGF-beta) and obliterative bronchiolitis following pulmonary transplantation. J Heart Lung Transplant. 1999;18:828–837. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (493 KB) | CrossRef

20. 20Norgaard MA, Andersen CB, Pettersson G. Does bronchial artery revascularization influence results concerning bronchiolitis obliterans syndrome and/or obliterative bronchiolitis after lung transplantation?. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 1998;14:311–318. Abstract | Full Text | Full-Text PDF (199 KB) | CrossRef

a Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

b Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

c Bloomberg School of Public Health, The Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland

Corresponding Author InformationReprint requests: Ashish S. Shah, MD, Assistant Professor of Surgery, Director, Lung Transplant Program, Division of Cardiac Surgery, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Blalock 618, 600 N. Wolfe St, Baltimore, MD 21287. Telephone: 410-502-3900. Fax: 410-955-3809

PII: S1053-2498(09)00532-4

doi:10.1016/j.healun.2009.06.027


View previous. 3 of 28 View next.