The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1211-1217, September 2005

Long-Term Results of Angioplasty Vs Stenting in Cardiac Transplant Recipients With Allograft Vasculopathy

Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia.

Received 31 July 2004; received in revised form 31 July 2004; accepted 11 October 2004. published online 16 May 2005.

Background

Allograft vasculopathy remains a major limiting factor in long-term graft survival. The absence of symptoms and diffuse nature of the disease make clinical detection and therapy more difficult. Limited data exist on the long-term outcome of percutaneous interventions in this group of patients.

Methods

Medical records and cardiac catheterizations from the Cardiac Cath Lab database were retrospectively reviewed for all cardiac transplant recipients who had undergone a percutaneous intervention. Procedural results, complications, use of stents and angiographic follow-up were recorded. Re-stenosis was defined as a lesion >50% in the target vessel at follow-up angiography.

Results

Thirty-three patients underwent 97 percutaneous interventions with a mean of 2.9 interventions per patient. Mean age at the time of first intervention was 52 ± 13 (mean ± standard deviation) years. Mean time from transplant to first intervention was 5 ± 3.0 years. The primary procedural success rate was 99%. Thirty-four procedures involved placement of a stent, 63 were angioplasty alone. There were no procedure-related complications. Seventy percent of lesions were de novo and 30% were re-stenotic lesions. Six-month, 12-month and 5-year target vessel re-stenosis rates in the stent group were 31%, 46% and 69%, and in the percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) group were 41%, 53% and 68%, respectively. Thirteen patients (39.3%) died or were re-transplanted, at 1.9 ± 2.29 (mean ± SD) years after their first intervention. Twenty patients were alive at 4.5 ± 2.99 years after the first intervention.

Conclusions

Percutaneous intervention can be performed safely in cardiac transplant recipients. Stent placement reduces early and mid-term re-stenosis, but late re-stenosis occurs in 70% of lesions. Late re-stenosis, development of new coronary lesions, and need for repeat intervention are common, regardless of the method used for percutaneous intervention, emphasizing the diffuse and progressive nature of transplant coronary disease.

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S1053-2498(04)00550-9

doi:10.1016/j.healun.2004.10.005

The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation
Volume 24, Issue 9 , Pages 1211-1217, September 2005